1. Define the boundary
Agree where the process starts, where it ends and what outcome counts as complete.
Our methodology separates observation from assumptions. We define the process boundary first, then measure how work really happens before proposing automation.
Our methodology separates observation from assumptions. We define the process boundary first, then measure how work really happens before proposing automation.
Agree where the process starts, where it ends and what outcome counts as complete.
Record frequency, active human time, waiting, rework and system hand-offs.
Separate the normal path from cases that need judgement or approval.
Check APIs, imports, databases, browser or desktop access and security constraints.
Automate a clearly defined path and keep high-risk decisions with people.
The audit is useful only if it turns observation into a concrete decision about scope, controls and measurement.
A clear start and end point, systems involved, standard path, hand-offs and the places where work waits for information or approval.
Cases that do not fit the normal path, why they happen and which of them should remain with a person during the pilot.
Which systems can be accessed through supported APIs, imports, databases, browser workflows or other controlled methods, including the security constraints.
Exactly which cases are in scope, what the agent may do, what must be approved and which before/after metrics will determine whether the pilot worked.
We will review how it works today, which systems are involved and what can realistically be automated.